Global Posts Rotating Header Image

October 20th, 2009:

Christine for 10/22

The rhythm of the readings we had for this week strike me as very different compared to the poetry and prose that we have read thus far. With the knowledge that we have about these writings are taken almost verbatim from personal letters Whitman wrote, perhaps I feel as though they are the most “life-like” for this reason exactly. The rhythm seems to be of a quicker tempo; a bit staccato, if you will. It seems to be very broken language, colloquial-like, without caring much about a flow. Very stream-of-conscious in the sense that he just says whatever comes to mind as fast as he can – like there is so much to say, but just not enough time (or paper, I guess!).

In two of the pieces, I noticed that Whitman used the word “melange,” which is a French word meaning a mixture, or medley of (typically) incongruous elements. I found this word choice rather intriguing, but quite Whitmanesque, considering that he always alludes to the fact that the mixing of races and genders is of no negativity in his own mind. The images of medley stem from the Civil War – that on the battlefield, the North and South are mixing together to fight for or against a single idea (in this case, slavery). How about also the idea of the white and black Americans joining together as one unit, versus white supremacy in power over the inferior blacks, even though not all would be slaves at this time (some would have already joined the Northern part of the U.S.).

I found it a bit disturbing how Whitman describes the cedar tree in such detail. I was not disturbed in such a way that I was scared, but I was taken back by how Whitman seemed to personify, almost, the tree’s position not only in the ground but also in the presence of a human’s life (the crazy old woman he sees in Camden). What about the cedar made her have such zeal and joy? Was it because she was crazy and was impressed by almost anything? Was Whitman’s interpretation of her zeal and joy mistaken for something else? Why did Whitman include the point about her “well-off married daughter”? Did I miss the point here? I’m assuming that the same person from whom he heard the lady was harmless told him that she lived with this daughter of hers… but why it would make a difference to the rest of the story?

The last little section of the “Cedar-Plums Like – Names” was pretty powerful, I felt. The point that everything has a name to distinguish it and separate its characteristics from other things can be translated into the names of people. Without names, we’d all be just faces, but what good is that when a name gives our face a purpose? It appears throuh this section that perhaps one of the major reasons for name-giving is to determine with what and whom we like to associate ourselves, so that each item/person is the basis for all other distinctions.

Christine for 10/22

The rhythm of the readings we had for this week strike me as very different compared to the poetry and prose that we have read thus far. With the knowledge that we have about these writings are taken almost verbatim from personal letters Whitman wrote, perhaps I feel as though they are the most “life-like” for this reason exactly. The rhythm seems to be of a quicker tempo; a bit staccato, if you will. It seems to be very broken language, colloquial-like, without caring much about a flow. Very stream-of-conscious in the sense that he just says whatever comes to mind as fast as he can – like there is so much to say, but just not enough time (or paper, I guess!).

In two of the pieces, I noticed that Whitman used the word “melange,” which is a French word meaning a mixture, or medley of (typically) incongruous elements. I found this word choice rather intriguing, but quite Whitmanesque, considering that he always alludes to the fact that the mixing of races and genders is of no negativity in his own mind. The images of medley stem from the Civil War – that on the battlefield, the North and South are mixing together to fight for or against a single idea (in this case, slavery). How about also the idea of the white and black Americans joining together as one unit, versus white supremacy in power over the inferior blacks, even though not all would be slaves at this time (some would have already joined the Northern part of the U.S.).

I found it a bit disturbing how Whitman describes the cedar tree in such detail. I was not disturbed in such a way that I was scared, but I was taken back by how Whitman seemed to personify, almost, the tree’s position not only in the ground but also in the presence of a human’s life (the crazy old woman he sees in Camden). What about the cedar made her have such zeal and joy? Was it because she was crazy and was impressed by almost anything? Was Whitman’s interpretation of her zeal and joy mistaken for something else? Why did Whitman include the point about her “well-off married daughter”? Did I miss the point here? I’m assuming that the same person from whom he heard the lady was harmless told him that she lived with this daughter of hers… but why it would make a difference to the rest of the story?

The last little section of the “Cedar-Plums Like – Names” was pretty powerful, I felt. The point that everything has a name to distinguish it and separate its characteristics from other things can be translated into the names of people. Without names, we’d all be just faces, but what good is that when a name gives our face a purpose? It appears throuh this section that perhaps one of the major reasons for name-giving is to determine with what and whom we like to associate ourselves, so that each item/person is the basis for all other distinctions.

Christine for 10/22

The rhythm of the readings we had for this week strike me as very different compared to the poetry and prose that we have read thus far. With the knowledge that we have about these writings are taken almost verbatim from personal letters Whitman wrote, perhaps I feel as though they are the most “life-like” for this reason exactly. The rhythm seems to be of a quicker tempo; a bit staccato, if you will. It seems to be very broken language, colloquial-like, without caring much about a flow. Very stream-of-conscious in the sense that he just says whatever comes to mind as fast as he can – like there is so much to say, but just not enough time (or paper, I guess!).

In two of the pieces, I noticed that Whitman used the word “melange,” which is a French word meaning a mixture, or medley of (typically) incongruous elements. I found this word choice rather intriguing, but quite Whitmanesque, considering that he always alludes to the fact that the mixing of races and genders is of no negativity in his own mind. The images of medley stem from the Civil War – that on the battlefield, the North and South are mixing together to fight for or against a single idea (in this case, slavery). How about also the idea of the white and black Americans joining together as one unit, versus white supremacy in power over the inferior blacks, even though not all would be slaves at this time (some would have already joined the Northern part of the U.S.).

I found it a bit disturbing how Whitman describes the cedar tree in such detail. I was not disturbed in such a way that I was scared, but I was taken back by how Whitman seemed to personify, almost, the tree’s position not only in the ground but also in the presence of a human’s life (the crazy old woman he sees in Camden). What about the cedar made her have such zeal and joy? Was it because she was crazy and was impressed by almost anything? Was Whitman’s interpretation of her zeal and joy mistaken for something else? Why did Whitman include the point about her “well-off married daughter”? Did I miss the point here? I’m assuming that the same person from whom he heard the lady was harmless told him that she lived with this daughter of hers… but why it would make a difference to the rest of the story?

The last little section of the “Cedar-Plums Like – Names” was pretty powerful, I felt. The point that everything has a name to distinguish it and separate its characteristics from other things can be translated into the names of people. Without names, we’d all be just faces, but what good is that when a name gives our face a purpose? It appears throuh this section that perhaps one of the major reasons for name-giving is to determine with what and whom we like to associate ourselves, so that each item/person is the basis for all other distinctions.

The RF&P Railroad – Material Culture Museum Entry

Map of Virginia railroads in 1865

Note the RF&P railroad on the right side.

When Walt Whitman came down to Fredericksburg in 1862, he traveled along a variety of different transportation methods including trains. Trains were a major factor in American travel before the Civil War and they would become invaluable to the war effort in the North and South. The railroads of Virginia were especially important to the outcome of the war, because of their location in a battleground state. The railway of the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac company was used by both the Confederate and the Union armies throughout the war. Its destruction and reconstruction was especially pivotal to the battle of Fredericksburg which drew Whitman down to Virginia and D.C.

The Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac railway company was chartered in 1834 and had track laid between Richmond and Fredericksburg by 1837. In 1842, the rail ran all the way to Aquia Creek, where a large wharf was built for the steamboats that provided transportation for the remainder of the journey to and from D.C. This is the state that the RF&P railroad was in when war broke out. In 1862, the Confederates retreated across the Rappahannock to Fredericksburg, abandoning approximately 13 miles of track, the wharves, and three bridges. To prevent the Union troops from using this stretch of railroad, the bridges and wharves were demolished, and the track was destroyed.

Herman Haupt, from a truly enormous wikipedia image

Herman Haupt, from a truly enormous wikipedia image

The same year, Herman Haupt, who wasthe commander of the construction corps of the new United States Military Railroad, was charged with rebuilding the railroad up to the Rappahannock for transportation of troops and supplies. With only a few small troops of untrained laborers, handtools, and limited supplies, Haupt rebuilt the wharves, the track and two of the bridges in a matter of weeks. The most impressive piece of this achievement was the bridge across Potomac Creek which needed to be over 400 feet long and 80 feet high and had originally been built by the RF&P co. over the course of a year. Haupt and his men had a bridge up in nine days and trains crossing it a few days after that. The bridge was built in an unconventional fashion using poles cut from the surrounding woods; however, it was sturdy enough for the job. After crossing the the bridge, Lincoln remarked that “upon my word, gentlemen, there is nothing in it but beanpoles and cornstalks” (Griffin 12). In August 1862, the Union army was moving northwards again and General Burnside, not yet commander of the army, ordered the destruction of the bridge. Haupt was understandably upset to see his work destroyed.

...nothing in it but beanpoles and cornstalks Abraham Lincoln

"...nothing in it but beanpoles and cornstalks" Abraham Lincoln

In a few months, however, he would have the opportunity to rebuild it. Burnside, now in command of the army, began assembling his men across the Rappahannock by Fredericksburg and once again the wharves, track and bridges had to be rebuilt or repaired to furnish the men with supplies and to offer transportation. This time, the bridge at Potomac Creek was built mainly with prefabricated pieces and remained in place through the battle. Although the railroad was in working order amazingly soon after the repairs began, they still took sometime to complete and this in part contributed to the Confederates’ readiness for the battle when it occurred.

Potomac Creek Bridge, taken on April 18, 1863 by Andrew J. Russell

Potomac Creek Bridge, taken on April 18, 1863 by Andrew J. Russell

This would have been the railroad that Whitman rode on to reach his brother in Fredericksburg. He would have ridden by steamboat down from D.C. to Aquia Creek landing and from there, he likely traveled the thirteen miles by train to the banks of the Rappahannock. When he was returning, he would have retraced his steps, although this time in the company of the many sick, wounded, and dying men that were also being transported up to D.C.

Ironically, the same railroad that assisted the Union army at the battle of Fredericksburg was simultaneously assisting the Confederate army. The track still ran south of Fredericksburg to Richmond and was invaluable for transportation of troops, supplies, and information. The trains were so invaluable that Lee ordered that the trains were not to enter Fredericksburg itself, for fear of attack by Union soldiers across the river, but that they should halt at Hamilton’s Crossing about four miles south of Fredericksburg. This was largely due to the increasing scarcity of locomotives and railcars in the south, where proper materials could not be found to repair or build new ones. To further hinder the Union forces in case of Confederate defeat at Fredericksburg, the track between Hamilton’s Crossing and Fredericksburg was torn up just before the battle, truly making the end of the line for the southern section of the RF&P railroad at Hamilton’s Crossing. The battle of Fredericksburg was an unpleasant intimation to Lee of scarcity that he and his men would face in the coming years, not just with locomotives, but with almost any necessity.

In the following winter, the rail services would suffer from undue demands put on them by the military as well as the ordinary citizens of Virginia. Wood especially was scarce, with the demand for firewood in soldier camps as well as in the cities for heat confronting the railroads’ own demands for wood for the boilers and repair of the railroad ties. This was aggravated by theft by undisciplined soldiers or civilians of both the railroad’s firewood and occasionally the railroad ties themselves.

While the southern section of the RF&P railroad remained mostly active for the remainder of the war, despite lack of materials, the section north of the Rappahannock was to be burned and rebuilt one more time, in 1864, when it was used to move wounded soldiers from the battles of the Wilderness and Spotsylvania Court House.

Otherwise, the railroad was used for private use through the war, including an increasingly lucrative contraband business across the Rappahannock. The main items of interest were tobacco and coffee, one lacking in the North, the other lacking in the South. In 1865, Grant decided to end the contraband trade in hopes of hastening the end of the war and captured a train full of tobacco and other supplies heading for Fredericksburg. The contraband was burned. Afterward, a systematic search was made of Fredericksburg houses for more contraband tobacco which was confiscated and burned as well. This ended the contraband trading through Fredericksburg during the war.

Christine’s Material Cultural Museum Exhibit: Telegraph

               The telegraph was developed for the purpose of uniting people across large distances, including a world-wide “civilization” of even the lowest of underdeveloped peoples. The first appearance of the electric telegraph in the United States was in 1828, invented by Harrison Dyar. Later, other versions of the electric telegraph were developed, including Joseph Henry’s electromagnetic (bell strike) version and Samuel Morse, who proved that signals, in code, could be transmitted over the wire signals sent through electromagnets. Paul Gilmore states in his article, “The Telegraph in Black and White,” “Because electricity was understood as both a physical and spiritual force, the telegraph was read both as separating thought from the body and thus making the body archaic, and as rematerializing though in the form of electricity, thereby raising the possibility of a new kind of body” (Gilmore, 806).  As the technology of the telegraph, telephone, and other electrical devices progressed, Whitman and other prominent authors, like Thoreau and Emerson, began to realize the connections between the electricity and the superiority/inferiority complexes of the white and black races. Other notable dichotomies are visible through the works of Whitman, who in particular, made some interesting associations between the electricity of the telegraph and sexuality and spirituality on the individual level as well as through interracial relationships. “Whitman [then] illustrates how the technology of electricity and the telegraph became a vehicle for imagining not simply a cultural and spiritual exchange between races which would unite them in brotherhood, but also a bodily, sexual exchange which would link the nation and the world in one blood” (Gilmore, 824).  Although the two ideas of spirituality and sexuality seems to be somewhat unrelated, Whitman does a fascinating job of expressing how closely related the telegraph’s inner-workings are to spirituality and sexuality, especially when observed through the lens of race.

               It was apparent that around Whitman’s time, many people approached the use of the developing telegraph as a metaphor for white superiority. “The telegraph was imagined as uniting white Americans into one body that would maintain the slave system, but at the same time, it separated white Americans from the body by making them the disembodied “brain of humanity” (Gilmore, 815). One interpretation of this statement would be that although the telegraph was an effort to connect all human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity, or the like, the overall achievement would actually be that the white Americans would be the ones in control of its operation and therefore still have an upper-hand over the blacks, specifically because of the time period; that is the Civil War era, where there was debate over the legitimacy of having slaves and slave trade. Therefore, in the context of the United States, although the telegraph’s position was to unite the nation for communication purposes, it would still leaving the white Americans to be the controlling factor, while the blacks would be left in still an inferior role, whether slaves or free.

               Whitman’s position to the subject of racial inferiority was quite the opposite, as readers have come to know through his poetry. Examples that prove Whitman’s opinion of racial equality would be Leaves of Grass as well as his prose works. Whitman’s tendency towards linking the races is alluded to in a few of his poems in Leaves of Grass where he celebrates the telegraph for communalizing nations and peoples. “While the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass, especially “I Sing the Body Electric,” celebrates the possibilities of cross-racial identifications, and perhaps even cross-racial sex, and describes ‘the procreant urge of the world’ as ‘electrical,’ these possibilities become explicitly linked to technologies like the telegraph in the postbellum poems, “Passage to India” (1871) and “Years of the Modern” (1865)” (Gilmore, 823). Here, Gilmore is stating that Whitman writes in the hopes of having interracial connections at some point in time, not only platonic, but relationships that can also be intimate or sexual.

                Whitman’s own sexuality is something that scholars even today attempt to reveal and so it really comes as no surprise that he sexualized the electricity of the telegraph as a reflection of his sexual nature. By the time Whitman began writing Leaves of Grass, the telegraph had become one of the few references for attributing the body as being electric. Even though adjustments were made to Leaves of Grass after the Civil War, “Whitman repeatedly mentions electricity, twice alluding to the telegraph” (Gilmore, 479). Whitman’s poem “To a Locomotive in Winter” portrays the uses of an inanimate object and the technological advances of it to further exemplify the body as “electric.” In his article entitled, “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’,” author Michael Collier states, “‘To a Locomotive in Winter’ is a thrilling example of ‘golden brass and silvery steel…side-bars and connecting rods…spring and valves’ to personify and humanize something mechanical to imbue a particular with his all-encompassing inclusive, idiosyncratic, obsessive, and modern sensibility” (Collier, 205). Of course Whitman, a man who was quite in tune with his own sexuality, even though he makes it quite hard for his readers to understand, inevitably changes the idea to not only is the body electric, but further that sex is manifested as electric. Whitman expands on the sexual implications in the 1855 version of “Song of Myself” when he claims, “I have instant conductors all over me whether I pass or stop, / They seize every object and lead it harmlessly through me. / I merely stir, press, feel with my fingers, and am happy, / To touch my person to some one else’s is about as much as I can stand” (Whitman, 55). This section of text seems to be quite sensual insofar as he states that simply touching is so electrically charged (sexually stimulating) that all he can bear is just that. 

                The final implication of the telegraph was the spirituality that Whitman was able to produce from it. The final two statements in Whitman’s poem, “I Sing the Body Electric” read, “O I say these are not the parts of the poems of the body only, but of the soul, / O I say now these are the soul,” (Whitman, 258) which emphasizes the ideals that Whitman has regarding electricity “as both spiritual and physical” (Gilmore, 148). It seems that Whitman wants to describe his own poetry as telegraphic or electric. However, “the kind of connection Whitman strives to achieve and his sense that such complete knowledge, such thorough communication, is impossible” (Gilmore, 153). The transcendence of message from sender to receiver in a telegraph is by far much easier than poet/writer to reader, due to lack of or skewed interpretation, diction, tone, mood, et cetera. Still, he clearly wants to suggest that similar to the electricity in the body is equivalent to sexual desire, so too is electricity indicative of spirituality.

               Whitman’s use of the telegraph in his writing was not necessarily that of his own physical use of such an item. Rather, he wrote about the capabilities that the telegraph had to explore his interpretations of larger worldly issues, like race, sexuality, and spirituality. It is intriguing to think that this one man managed to accentuate the concept of worldly connection to broader issues that affect all people of the world; that one immaterial object, although used for communication, became another hindrance to the equality of races, that he already believed in, and also represented other human ideas.

Some more pictures of telegraphic items:

 

Listen to the Alphabet in Morse Code on YouTube:

Alphabet in Morse Code

 This sign is called “Early Telegraph”. It stands today in Elizabethtown, PA (near Lancaster) and it reads: “First commercial telegraph line in the U.S. ran along this railroad right-of-way. Completed from Lancaster to Harrisburg, 1845. The first message, ‘Why don’t you write, you rascals?’, was received, Jan. 8, 1846.” 

 

 

Works Cited:

  1. Collier, Michael. “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’.” Virginia Quarterly Review. Page 205.
  2. Gilmore, Paul. “Mad Filaments: Walt Whitman’s Aesthetic Body Telegraphic.” Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism. Stanford University Press. Standford, California. 2009. Pages 148, 153.
  3. Gilmore, Paul. “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics.” American Literature, Volume 76, Number 3. Duke University Press. 2004. Page 479.
  4. Gilmore, Paul. “The Telegraph in Black and White.” ELH 69. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2002. Pages 806, 815, 823-24.
  5. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass; “I Sing the Body Electric.” Poetry and Prose. Ed. Justin Kaplan. The Library of America. Penguin Books. New York, NY. 1996. Pages 55, 258.

Christine’s Material Cultural Museum Exhibit: Telegraph

               The telegraph was developed for the purpose of uniting people across large distances, including a world-wide “civilization” of even the lowest of underdeveloped peoples. The first appearance of the electric telegraph in the United States was in 1828, invented by Harrison Dyar. Later, other versions of the electric telegraph were developed, including Joseph Henry’s electromagnetic (bell strike) version and Samuel Morse, who proved that signals, in code, could be transmitted over the wire signals sent through electromagnets. Paul Gilmore states in his article, “The Telegraph in Black and White,” “Because electricity was understood as both a physical and spiritual force, the telegraph was read both as separating thought from the body and thus making the body archaic, and as rematerializing though in the form of electricity, thereby raising the possibility of a new kind of body” (Gilmore, 806).  As the technology of the telegraph, telephone, and other electrical devices progressed, Whitman and other prominent authors, like Thoreau and Emerson, began to realize the connections between the electricity and the superiority/inferiority complexes of the white and black races. Other notable dichotomies are visible through the works of Whitman, who in particular, made some interesting associations between the electricity of the telegraph and sexuality and spirituality on the individual level as well as through interracial relationships. “Whitman [then] illustrates how the technology of electricity and the telegraph became a vehicle for imagining not simply a cultural and spiritual exchange between races which would unite them in brotherhood, but also a bodily, sexual exchange which would link the nation and the world in one blood” (Gilmore, 824).  Although the two ideas of spirituality and sexuality seems to be somewhat unrelated, Whitman does a fascinating job of expressing how closely related the telegraph’s inner-workings are to spirituality and sexuality, especially when observed through the lens of race.

               It was apparent that around Whitman’s time, many people approached the use of the developing telegraph as a metaphor for white superiority. “The telegraph was imagined as uniting white Americans into one body that would maintain the slave system, but at the same time, it separated white Americans from the body by making them the disembodied “brain of humanity” (Gilmore, 815). One interpretation of this statement would be that although the telegraph was an effort to connect all human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity, or the like, the overall achievement would actually be that the white Americans would be the ones in control of its operation and therefore still have an upper-hand over the blacks, specifically because of the time period; that is the Civil War era, where there was debate over the legitimacy of having slaves and slave trade. Therefore, in the context of the United States, although the telegraph’s position was to unite the nation for communication purposes, it would still leaving the white Americans to be the controlling factor, while the blacks would be left in still an inferior role, whether slaves or free.

               Whitman’s position to the subject of racial inferiority was quite the opposite, as readers have come to know through his poetry. Examples that prove Whitman’s opinion of racial equality would be Leaves of Grass as well as his prose works. Whitman’s tendency towards linking the races is alluded to in a few of his poems in Leaves of Grass where he celebrates the telegraph for communalizing nations and peoples. “While the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass, especially “I Sing the Body Electric,” celebrates the possibilities of cross-racial identifications, and perhaps even cross-racial sex, and describes ‘the procreant urge of the world’ as ‘electrical,’ these possibilities become explicitly linked to technologies like the telegraph in the postbellum poems, “Passage to India” (1871) and “Years of the Modern” (1865)” (Gilmore, 823). Here, Gilmore is stating that Whitman writes in the hopes of having interracial connections at some point in time, not only platonic, but relationships that can also be intimate or sexual.

                Whitman’s own sexuality is something that scholars even today attempt to reveal and so it really comes as no surprise that he sexualized the electricity of the telegraph as a reflection of his sexual nature. By the time Whitman began writing Leaves of Grass, the telegraph had become one of the few references for attributing the body as being electric. Even though adjustments were made to Leaves of Grass after the Civil War, “Whitman repeatedly mentions electricity, twice alluding to the telegraph” (Gilmore, 479). Whitman’s poem “To a Locomotive in Winter” portrays the uses of an inanimate object and the technological advances of it to further exemplify the body as “electric.” In his article entitled, “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’,” author Michael Collier states, “‘To a Locomotive in Winter’ is a thrilling example of ‘golden brass and silvery steel…side-bars and connecting rods…spring and valves’ to personify and humanize something mechanical to imbue a particular with his all-encompassing inclusive, idiosyncratic, obsessive, and modern sensibility” (Collier, 205). Of course Whitman, a man who was quite in tune with his own sexuality, even though he makes it quite hard for his readers to understand, inevitably changes the idea to not only is the body electric, but further that sex is manifested as electric. Whitman expands on the sexual implications in the 1855 version of “Song of Myself” when he claims, “I have instant conductors all over me whether I pass or stop, / They seize every object and lead it harmlessly through me. / I merely stir, press, feel with my fingers, and am happy, / To touch my person to some one else’s is about as much as I can stand” (Whitman, 55). This section of text seems to be quite sensual insofar as he states that simply touching is so electrically charged (sexually stimulating) that all he can bear is just that. 

                The final implication of the telegraph was the spirituality that Whitman was able to produce from it. The final two statements in Whitman’s poem, “I Sing the Body Electric” read, “O I say these are not the parts of the poems of the body only, but of the soul, / O I say now these are the soul,” (Whitman, 258) which emphasizes the ideals that Whitman has regarding electricity “as both spiritual and physical” (Gilmore, 148). It seems that Whitman wants to describe his own poetry as telegraphic or electric. However, “the kind of connection Whitman strives to achieve and his sense that such complete knowledge, such thorough communication, is impossible” (Gilmore, 153). The transcendence of message from sender to receiver in a telegraph is by far much easier than poet/writer to reader, due to lack of or skewed interpretation, diction, tone, mood, et cetera. Still, he clearly wants to suggest that similar to the electricity in the body is equivalent to sexual desire, so too is electricity indicative of spirituality.

               Whitman’s use of the telegraph in his writing was not necessarily that of his own physical use of such an item. Rather, he wrote about the capabilities that the telegraph had to explore his interpretations of larger worldly issues, like race, sexuality, and spirituality. It is intriguing to think that this one man managed to accentuate the concept of worldly connection to broader issues that affect all people of the world; that one immaterial object, although used for communication, became another hindrance to the equality of races, that he already believed in, and also represented other human ideas.

Some more pictures of telegraphic items:

 

Listen to the Alphabet in Morse Code on YouTube:

Alphabet in Morse Code

 This sign is called “Early Telegraph”. It stands today in Elizabethtown, PA (near Lancaster) and it reads: “First commercial telegraph line in the U.S. ran along this railroad right-of-way. Completed from Lancaster to Harrisburg, 1845. The first message, ‘Why don’t you write, you rascals?’, was received, Jan. 8, 1846.” 

 

 

Works Cited:

  1. Collier, Michael. “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’.” Virginia Quarterly Review. Page 205.
  2. Gilmore, Paul. “Mad Filaments: Walt Whitman’s Aesthetic Body Telegraphic.” Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism. Stanford University Press. Standford, California. 2009. Pages 148, 153.
  3. Gilmore, Paul. “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics.” American Literature, Volume 76, Number 3. Duke University Press. 2004. Page 479.
  4. Gilmore, Paul. “The Telegraph in Black and White.” ELH 69. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2002. Pages 806, 815, 823-24.
  5. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass; “I Sing the Body Electric.” Poetry and Prose. Ed. Justin Kaplan. The Library of America. Penguin Books. New York, NY. 1996. Pages 55, 258.

Christine’s Material Cultural Museum Exhibit: Telegraph

               The telegraph was developed for the purpose of uniting people across large distances, including a world-wide “civilization” of even the lowest of underdeveloped peoples. The first appearance of the electric telegraph in the United States was in 1828, invented by Harrison Dyar. Later, other versions of the electric telegraph were developed, including Joseph Henry’s electromagnetic (bell strike) version and Samuel Morse, who proved that signals, in code, could be transmitted over the wire signals sent through electromagnets. Paul Gilmore states in his article, “The Telegraph in Black and White,” “Because electricity was understood as both a physical and spiritual force, the telegraph was read both as separating thought from the body and thus making the body archaic, and as rematerializing though in the form of electricity, thereby raising the possibility of a new kind of body” (Gilmore, 806).  As the technology of the telegraph, telephone, and other electrical devices progressed, Whitman and other prominent authors, like Thoreau and Emerson, began to realize the connections between the electricity and the superiority/inferiority complexes of the white and black races. Other notable dichotomies are visible through the works of Whitman, who in particular, made some interesting associations between the electricity of the telegraph and sexuality and spirituality on the individual level as well as through interracial relationships. “Whitman [then] illustrates how the technology of electricity and the telegraph became a vehicle for imagining not simply a cultural and spiritual exchange between races which would unite them in brotherhood, but also a bodily, sexual exchange which would link the nation and the world in one blood” (Gilmore, 824).  Although the two ideas of spirituality and sexuality seems to be somewhat unrelated, Whitman does a fascinating job of expressing how closely related the telegraph’s inner-workings are to spirituality and sexuality, especially when observed through the lens of race.

               It was apparent that around Whitman’s time, many people approached the use of the developing telegraph as a metaphor for white superiority. “The telegraph was imagined as uniting white Americans into one body that would maintain the slave system, but at the same time, it separated white Americans from the body by making them the disembodied “brain of humanity” (Gilmore, 815). One interpretation of this statement would be that although the telegraph was an effort to connect all human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity, or the like, the overall achievement would actually be that the white Americans would be the ones in control of its operation and therefore still have an upper-hand over the blacks, specifically because of the time period; that is the Civil War era, where there was debate over the legitimacy of having slaves and slave trade. Therefore, in the context of the United States, although the telegraph’s position was to unite the nation for communication purposes, it would still leaving the white Americans to be the controlling factor, while the blacks would be left in still an inferior role, whether slaves or free.

               Whitman’s position to the subject of racial inferiority was quite the opposite, as readers have come to know through his poetry. Examples that prove Whitman’s opinion of racial equality would be Leaves of Grass as well as his prose works. Whitman’s tendency towards linking the races is alluded to in a few of his poems in Leaves of Grass where he celebrates the telegraph for communalizing nations and peoples. “While the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass, especially “I Sing the Body Electric,” celebrates the possibilities of cross-racial identifications, and perhaps even cross-racial sex, and describes ‘the procreant urge of the world’ as ‘electrical,’ these possibilities become explicitly linked to technologies like the telegraph in the postbellum poems, “Passage to India” (1871) and “Years of the Modern” (1865)” (Gilmore, 823). Here, Gilmore is stating that Whitman writes in the hopes of having interracial connections at some point in time, not only platonic, but relationships that can also be intimate or sexual.

                Whitman’s own sexuality is something that scholars even today attempt to reveal and so it really comes as no surprise that he sexualized the electricity of the telegraph as a reflection of his sexual nature. By the time Whitman began writing Leaves of Grass, the telegraph had become one of the few references for attributing the body as being electric. Even though adjustments were made to Leaves of Grass after the Civil War, “Whitman repeatedly mentions electricity, twice alluding to the telegraph” (Gilmore, 479). Whitman’s poem “To a Locomotive in Winter” portrays the uses of an inanimate object and the technological advances of it to further exemplify the body as “electric.” In his article entitled, “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’,” author Michael Collier states, “‘To a Locomotive in Winter’ is a thrilling example of ‘golden brass and silvery steel…side-bars and connecting rods…spring and valves’ to personify and humanize something mechanical to imbue a particular with his all-encompassing inclusive, idiosyncratic, obsessive, and modern sensibility” (Collier, 205). Of course Whitman, a man who was quite in tune with his own sexuality, even though he makes it quite hard for his readers to understand, inevitably changes the idea to not only is the body electric, but further that sex is manifested as electric. Whitman expands on the sexual implications in the 1855 version of “Song of Myself” when he claims, “I have instant conductors all over me whether I pass or stop, / They seize every object and lead it harmlessly through me. / I merely stir, press, feel with my fingers, and am happy, / To touch my person to some one else’s is about as much as I can stand” (Whitman, 55). This section of text seems to be quite sensual insofar as he states that simply touching is so electrically charged (sexually stimulating) that all he can bear is just that. 

                The final implication of the telegraph was the spirituality that Whitman was able to produce from it. The final two statements in Whitman’s poem, “I Sing the Body Electric” read, “O I say these are not the parts of the poems of the body only, but of the soul, / O I say now these are the soul,” (Whitman, 258) which emphasizes the ideals that Whitman has regarding electricity “as both spiritual and physical” (Gilmore, 148). It seems that Whitman wants to describe his own poetry as telegraphic or electric. However, “the kind of connection Whitman strives to achieve and his sense that such complete knowledge, such thorough communication, is impossible” (Gilmore, 153). The transcendence of message from sender to receiver in a telegraph is by far much easier than poet/writer to reader, due to lack of or skewed interpretation, diction, tone, mood, et cetera. Still, he clearly wants to suggest that similar to the electricity in the body is equivalent to sexual desire, so too is electricity indicative of spirituality.

               Whitman’s use of the telegraph in his writing was not necessarily that of his own physical use of such an item. Rather, he wrote about the capabilities that the telegraph had to explore his interpretations of larger worldly issues, like race, sexuality, and spirituality. It is intriguing to think that this one man managed to accentuate the concept of worldly connection to broader issues that affect all people of the world; that one immaterial object, although used for communication, became another hindrance to the equality of races, that he already believed in, and also represented other human ideas.

Some more pictures of telegraphic items:

 

Listen to the Alphabet in Morse Code on YouTube:

Alphabet in Morse Code

 This sign is called “Early Telegraph”. It stands today in Elizabethtown, PA (near Lancaster) and it reads: “First commercial telegraph line in the U.S. ran along this railroad right-of-way. Completed from Lancaster to Harrisburg, 1845. The first message, ‘Why don’t you write, you rascals?’, was received, Jan. 8, 1846.” 

 

 

Works Cited:

  1. Collier, Michael. “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’.” Virginia Quarterly Review. Page 205.
  2. Gilmore, Paul. “Mad Filaments: Walt Whitman’s Aesthetic Body Telegraphic.” Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism. Stanford University Press. Standford, California. 2009. Pages 148, 153.
  3. Gilmore, Paul. “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics.” American Literature, Volume 76, Number 3. Duke University Press. 2004. Page 479.
  4. Gilmore, Paul. “The Telegraph in Black and White.” ELH 69. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2002. Pages 806, 815, 823-24.
  5. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass; “I Sing the Body Electric.” Poetry and Prose. Ed. Justin Kaplan. The Library of America. Penguin Books. New York, NY. 1996. Pages 55, 258.

Telegraph

The telegraph was developed for the purpose of uniting people across large distances, including a world-wide “civilization” of even the lowest of underdeveloped peoples. The first appearance of the electric telegraph in the United States was in 1828, invented by Harrison Dyar. Later, other versions of the electric telegraph were developed, including Joseph Henry’s electromagnetic (bell strike) version and Samuel Morse, who proved that signals, in code, could be transmitted over the wire signals sent through electromagnets. Paul Gilmore states in his article, “The Telegraph in Black and White,” “Because electricity was understood as both a physical and spiritual force, the telegraph was read both as separating thought from the body and thus making the body archaic, and as rematerializing though in the form of electricity, thereby raising the possibility of a new kind of body” (Gilmore, 806).  As the technology of the telegraph, telephone, and other electrical devices progressed, Whitman and other prominent authors, like Thoreau and Emerson, began to realize the connections between the electricity and the superiority/inferiority complexes of the white and black races. Other notable dichotomies are visible through the works of Whitman, who in particular, made some interesting associations between the electricity of the telegraph and sexuality and spirituality on the individual level as well as through interracial relationships. “Whitman [then] illustrates how the technology of electricity and the telegraph became a vehicle for imagining not simply a cultural and spiritual exchange between races which would unite them in brotherhood, but also a bodily, sexual exchange which would link the nation and the world in one blood” (Gilmore, 824).  Although the two ideas of spirituality and sexuality seems to be somewhat unrelated, Whitman does a fascinating job of expressing how closely related the telegraph’s inner-workings are to spirituality and sexuality, especially when observed through the lens of race.

It was apparent that around Whitman’s time, many people approached the use of the developing telegraph as a metaphor for white superiority. “The telegraph was imagined as uniting white Americans into one body that would maintain the slave system, but at the same time, it separated white Americans from the body by making them the disembodied “brain of humanity” (Gilmore, 815). One interpretation of this statement would be that although the telegraph was an effort to connect all human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity, or the like, the overall achievement would actually be that the white Americans would be the ones in control of its operation and therefore still have an upper-hand over the blacks, specifically because of the time period; that is the Civil War era, where there was debate over the legitimacy of having slaves and slave trade. Therefore, in the context of the United States, although the telegraph’s position was to unite the nation for communication purposes, it would still leaving the white Americans to be the controlling factor, while the blacks would be left in still an inferior role, whether slaves or free.

Whitman’s position to the subject of racial inferiority was quite the opposite, as readers have come to know through his poetry. Examples that prove Whitman’s opinion of racial equality would be Leaves of Grass as well as his prose works. Whitman’s tendency towards linking the races is alluded to in a few of his poems in Leaves of Grass where he celebrates the telegraph for communalizing nations and peoples. “While the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass, especially “I Sing the Body Electric,” celebrates the possibilities of cross-racial identifications, and perhaps even cross-racial sex, and describes ‘the procreant urge of the world’ as ‘electrical,’ these possibilities become explicitly linked to technologies like the telegraph in the postbellum poems, “Passage to India” (1871) and “Years of the Modern” (1865)” (Gilmore, 823). Here, Gilmore is stating that Whitman writes in the hopes of having interracial connections at some point in time, not only platonic, but relationships that can also be intimate or sexual.

Whitman’s own sexuality is something that scholars even today attempt to reveal and so it really comes as no surprise that he sexualized the electricity of the telegraph as a reflection of his sexual nature. By the time Whitman began writing Leaves of Grass, the telegraph had become one of the few references for attributing the body as being electric. Even though adjustments were made to Leaves of Grass after the Civil War, “Whitman repeatedly mentions electricity, twice alluding to the telegraph” (Gilmore, 479). Whitman’s poem “To a Locomotive in Winter” portrays the uses of an inanimate object and the technological advances of it to further exemplify the body as “electric.” In his article entitled, “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’,” author Michael Collier states, “‘To a Locomotive in Winter’ is a thrilling example of ‘golden brass and silvery steel…side-bars and connecting rods…spring and valves’ to personify and humanize something mechanical to imbue a particular with his all-encompassing inclusive, idiosyncratic, obsessive, and modern sensibility” (Collier, 205). Of course Whitman, a man who was quite in tune with his own sexuality, even though he makes it quite hard for his readers to understand, inevitably changes the idea to not only is the body electric, but further that sex is manifested as electric. Whitman expands on the sexual implications in the 1855 version of “Song of Myself” when he claims, “I have instant conductors all over me whether I pass or stop, / They seize every object and lead it harmlessly through me. / I merely stir, press, feel with my fingers, and am happy, / To touch my person to some one else’s is about as much as I can stand” (Whitman, 55). This section of text seems to be quite sensual insofar as he states that simply touching is so electrically charged (sexually stimulating) that all he can bear is just that.

The final implication of the telegraph was the spirituality that Whitman was able to produce from it. The final two statements in Whitman’s poem, “I Sing the Body Electric” read, “O I say these are not the parts of the poems of the body only, but of the soul, / O I say now these are the soul,” (Whitman, 258) which emphasizes the ideals that Whitman has regarding electricity “as both spiritual and physical” (Gilmore, 148). It seems that Whitman wants to describe his own poetry as telegraphic or electric. However, “the kind of connection Whitman strives to achieve and his sense that such complete knowledge, such thorough communication, is impossible” (Gilmore, 153). The transcendence of message from sender to receiver in a telegraph is by far much easier than poet/writer to reader, due to lack of or skewed interpretation, diction, tone, mood, et cetera. Still, he clearly wants to suggest that similar to the electricity in the body is equivalent to sexual desire, so too is electricity indicative of spirituality.

Whitman’s use of the telegraph in his writing was not necessarily that of his own physical use of such an item. Rather, he wrote about the capabilities that the telegraph had to explore his interpretations of larger worldly issues, like race, sexuality, and spirituality. It is intriguing to think that this one man managed to accentuate the concept of worldly connection to broader issues that affect all people of the world; that one immaterial object, although used for communication, became another hindrance to the equality of races, that he already believed in, and also represented other human ideas.

Some more pictures of telegraphic items:

Listen to the Alphabet in Morse Code on YouTube:

Alphabet in Morse Code

This sign is called “Early Telegraph”. It stands today in Elizabethtown, PA (near Lancaster) and it reads: “First commercial telegraph line in the U.S. ran along this railroad right-of-way. Completed from Lancaster to Harrisburg, 1845. The first message, ‘Why don’t you write, you rascals?’, was received, Jan. 8, 1846.”

Works Cited:

  1. Collier, Michael. “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’.” Virginia Quarterly Review. Page 205.
  2. Gilmore, Paul. “Mad Filaments: Walt Whitman’s Aesthetic Body Telegraphic.” Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism. Stanford University Press. Standford, California. 2009. Pages 148, 153.
  3. Gilmore, Paul. “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics.” American Literature, Volume 76, Number 3. Duke University Press. 2004. Page 479.
  4. Gilmore, Paul. “The Telegraph in Black and White.” ELH 69. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2002. Pages 806, 815, 823-24.
  5. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass; “I Sing the Body Electric.” Poetry and Prose. Ed. Justin Kaplan. The Library of America. Penguin Books. New York, NY. 1996. Pages 55, 258.

Christine’s Material Cultural Museum Exhibit: Telegraph

               The telegraph was developed for the purpose of uniting people across large distances, including a world-wide “civilization” of even the lowest of underdeveloped peoples. The first appearance of the electric telegraph in the United States was in 1828, invented by Harrison Dyar. Later, other versions of the electric telegraph were developed, including Joseph Henry’s electromagnetic (bell strike) version and Samuel Morse, who proved that signals, in code, could be transmitted over the wire signals sent through electromagnets. Paul Gilmore states in his article, “The Telegraph in Black and White,” “Because electricity was understood as both a physical and spiritual force, the telegraph was read both as separating thought from the body and thus making the body archaic, and as rematerializing though in the form of electricity, thereby raising the possibility of a new kind of body” (Gilmore, 806).  As the technology of the telegraph, telephone, and other electrical devices progressed, Whitman and other prominent authors, like Thoreau and Emerson, began to realize the connections between the electricity and the superiority/inferiority complexes of the white and black races. Other notable dichotomies are visible through the works of Whitman, who in particular, made some interesting associations between the electricity of the telegraph and sexuality and spirituality on the individual level as well as through interracial relationships. “Whitman [then] illustrates how the technology of electricity and the telegraph became a vehicle for imagining not simply a cultural and spiritual exchange between races which would unite them in brotherhood, but also a bodily, sexual exchange which would link the nation and the world in one blood” (Gilmore, 824).  Although the two ideas of spirituality and sexuality seems to be somewhat unrelated, Whitman does a fascinating job of expressing how closely related the telegraph’s inner-workings are to spirituality and sexuality, especially when observed through the lens of race.

               It was apparent that around Whitman’s time, many people approached the use of the developing telegraph as a metaphor for white superiority. “The telegraph was imagined as uniting white Americans into one body that would maintain the slave system, but at the same time, it separated white Americans from the body by making them the disembodied “brain of humanity” (Gilmore, 815). One interpretation of this statement would be that although the telegraph was an effort to connect all human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity, or the like, the overall achievement would actually be that the white Americans would be the ones in control of its operation and therefore still have an upper-hand over the blacks, specifically because of the time period; that is the Civil War era, where there was debate over the legitimacy of having slaves and slave trade. Therefore, in the context of the United States, although the telegraph’s position was to unite the nation for communication purposes, it would still leaving the white Americans to be the controlling factor, while the blacks would be left in still an inferior role, whether slaves or free.

               Whitman’s position to the subject of racial inferiority was quite the opposite, as readers have come to know through his poetry. Examples that prove Whitman’s opinion of racial equality would be Leaves of Grass as well as his prose works. Whitman’s tendency towards linking the races is alluded to in a few of his poems in Leaves of Grass where he celebrates the telegraph for communalizing nations and peoples. “While the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass, especially “I Sing the Body Electric,” celebrates the possibilities of cross-racial identifications, and perhaps even cross-racial sex, and describes ‘the procreant urge of the world’ as ‘electrical,’ these possibilities become explicitly linked to technologies like the telegraph in the postbellum poems, “Passage to India” (1871) and “Years of the Modern” (1865)” (Gilmore, 823). Here, Gilmore is stating that Whitman writes in the hopes of having interracial connections at some point in time, not only platonic, but relationships that can also be intimate or sexual.

                Whitman’s own sexuality is something that scholars even today attempt to reveal and so it really comes as no surprise that he sexualized the electricity of the telegraph as a reflection of his sexual nature. By the time Whitman began writing Leaves of Grass, the telegraph had become one of the few references for attributing the body as being electric. Even though adjustments were made to Leaves of Grass after the Civil War, “Whitman repeatedly mentions electricity, twice alluding to the telegraph” (Gilmore, 479). Whitman’s poem “To a Locomotive in Winter” portrays the uses of an inanimate object and the technological advances of it to further exemplify the body as “electric.” In his article entitled, “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’,” author Michael Collier states, “‘To a Locomotive in Winter’ is a thrilling example of ‘golden brass and silvery steel…side-bars and connecting rods…spring and valves’ to personify and humanize something mechanical to imbue a particular with his all-encompassing inclusive, idiosyncratic, obsessive, and modern sensibility” (Collier, 205). Of course Whitman, a man who was quite in tune with his own sexuality, even though he makes it quite hard for his readers to understand, inevitably changes the idea to not only is the body electric, but further that sex is manifested as electric. Whitman expands on the sexual implications in the 1855 version of “Song of Myself” when he claims, “I have instant conductors all over me whether I pass or stop, / They seize every object and lead it harmlessly through me. / I merely stir, press, feel with my fingers, and am happy, / To touch my person to some one else’s is about as much as I can stand” (Whitman, 55). This section of text seems to be quite sensual insofar as he states that simply touching is so electrically charged (sexually stimulating) that all he can bear is just that. 

                The final implication of the telegraph was the spirituality that Whitman was able to produce from it. The final two statements in Whitman’s poem, “I Sing the Body Electric” read, “O I say these are not the parts of the poems of the body only, but of the soul, / O I say now these are the soul,” (Whitman, 258) which emphasizes the ideals that Whitman has regarding electricity “as both spiritual and physical” (Gilmore, 148). It seems that Whitman wants to describe his own poetry as telegraphic or electric. However, “the kind of connection Whitman strives to achieve and his sense that such complete knowledge, such thorough communication, is impossible” (Gilmore, 153). The transcendence of message from sender to receiver in a telegraph is by far much easier than poet/writer to reader, due to lack of or skewed interpretation, diction, tone, mood, et cetera. Still, he clearly wants to suggest that similar to the electricity in the body is equivalent to sexual desire, so too is electricity indicative of spirituality.

               Whitman’s use of the telegraph in his writing was not necessarily that of his own physical use of such an item. Rather, he wrote about the capabilities that the telegraph had to explore his interpretations of larger worldly issues, like race, sexuality, and spirituality. It is intriguing to think that this one man managed to accentuate the concept of worldly connection to broader issues that affect all people of the world; that one immaterial object, although used for communication, became another hindrance to the equality of races, that he already believed in, and also represented other human ideas.

Some more pictures of telegraphic items:

 

Listen to the Alphabet in Morse Code on YouTube:

Alphabet in Morse Code

 This sign is called “Early Telegraph”. It stands today in Elizabethtown, PA (near Lancaster) and it reads: “First commercial telegraph line in the U.S. ran along this railroad right-of-way. Completed from Lancaster to Harrisburg, 1845. The first message, ‘Why don’t you write, you rascals?’, was received, Jan. 8, 1846.” 

 

 

Works Cited:

  1. Collier, Michael. “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’.” Virginia Quarterly Review. Page 205.
  2. Gilmore, Paul. “Mad Filaments: Walt Whitman’s Aesthetic Body Telegraphic.” Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism. Stanford University Press. Standford, California. 2009. Pages 148, 153.
  3. Gilmore, Paul. “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics.” American Literature, Volume 76, Number 3. Duke University Press. 2004. Page 479.
  4. Gilmore, Paul. “The Telegraph in Black and White.” ELH 69. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2002. Pages 806, 815, 823-24.
  5. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass; “I Sing the Body Electric.” Poetry and Prose. Ed. Justin Kaplan. The Library of America. Penguin Books. New York, NY. 1996. Pages 55, 258.

Christine’s Material Cultural Museum Exhibit: Telegraph

               The telegraph was developed for the purpose of uniting people across large distances, including a world-wide “civilization” of even the lowest of underdeveloped peoples. The first appearance of the electric telegraph in the United States was in 1828, invented by Harrison Dyar. Later, other versions of the electric telegraph were developed, including Joseph Henry’s electromagnetic (bell strike) version and Samuel Morse, who proved that signals, in code, could be transmitted over the wire signals sent through electromagnets. Paul Gilmore states in his article, “The Telegraph in Black and White,” “Because electricity was understood as both a physical and spiritual force, the telegraph was read both as separating thought from the body and thus making the body archaic, and as rematerializing though in the form of electricity, thereby raising the possibility of a new kind of body” (Gilmore, 806).  As the technology of the telegraph, telephone, and other electrical devices progressed, Whitman and other prominent authors, like Thoreau and Emerson, began to realize the connections between the electricity and the superiority/inferiority complexes of the white and black races. Other notable dichotomies are visible through the works of Whitman, who in particular, made some interesting associations between the electricity of the telegraph and sexuality and spirituality on the individual level as well as through interracial relationships. “Whitman [then] illustrates how the technology of electricity and the telegraph became a vehicle for imagining not simply a cultural and spiritual exchange between races which would unite them in brotherhood, but also a bodily, sexual exchange which would link the nation and the world in one blood” (Gilmore, 824).  Although the two ideas of spirituality and sexuality seems to be somewhat unrelated, Whitman does a fascinating job of expressing how closely related the telegraph’s inner-workings are to spirituality and sexuality, especially when observed through the lens of race.

               It was apparent that around Whitman’s time, many people approached the use of the developing telegraph as a metaphor for white superiority. “The telegraph was imagined as uniting white Americans into one body that would maintain the slave system, but at the same time, it separated white Americans from the body by making them the disembodied “brain of humanity” (Gilmore, 815). One interpretation of this statement would be that although the telegraph was an effort to connect all human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity, or the like, the overall achievement would actually be that the white Americans would be the ones in control of its operation and therefore still have an upper-hand over the blacks, specifically because of the time period; that is the Civil War era, where there was debate over the legitimacy of having slaves and slave trade. Therefore, in the context of the United States, although the telegraph’s position was to unite the nation for communication purposes, it would still leaving the white Americans to be the controlling factor, while the blacks would be left in still an inferior role, whether slaves or free.

               Whitman’s position to the subject of racial inferiority was quite the opposite, as readers have come to know through his poetry. Examples that prove Whitman’s opinion of racial equality would be Leaves of Grass as well as his prose works. Whitman’s tendency towards linking the races is alluded to in a few of his poems in Leaves of Grass where he celebrates the telegraph for communalizing nations and peoples. “While the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass, especially “I Sing the Body Electric,” celebrates the possibilities of cross-racial identifications, and perhaps even cross-racial sex, and describes ‘the procreant urge of the world’ as ‘electrical,’ these possibilities become explicitly linked to technologies like the telegraph in the postbellum poems, “Passage to India” (1871) and “Years of the Modern” (1865)” (Gilmore, 823). Here, Gilmore is stating that Whitman writes in the hopes of having interracial connections at some point in time, not only platonic, but relationships that can also be intimate or sexual.

                Whitman’s own sexuality is something that scholars even today attempt to reveal and so it really comes as no surprise that he sexualized the electricity of the telegraph as a reflection of his sexual nature. By the time Whitman began writing Leaves of Grass, the telegraph had become one of the few references for attributing the body as being electric. Even though adjustments were made to Leaves of Grass after the Civil War, “Whitman repeatedly mentions electricity, twice alluding to the telegraph” (Gilmore, 479). Whitman’s poem “To a Locomotive in Winter” portrays the uses of an inanimate object and the technological advances of it to further exemplify the body as “electric.” In his article entitled, “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’,” author Michael Collier states, “‘To a Locomotive in Winter’ is a thrilling example of ‘golden brass and silvery steel…side-bars and connecting rods…spring and valves’ to personify and humanize something mechanical to imbue a particular with his all-encompassing inclusive, idiosyncratic, obsessive, and modern sensibility” (Collier, 205). Of course Whitman, a man who was quite in tune with his own sexuality, even though he makes it quite hard for his readers to understand, inevitably changes the idea to not only is the body electric, but further that sex is manifested as electric. Whitman expands on the sexual implications in the 1855 version of “Song of Myself” when he claims, “I have instant conductors all over me whether I pass or stop, / They seize every object and lead it harmlessly through me. / I merely stir, press, feel with my fingers, and am happy, / To touch my person to some one else’s is about as much as I can stand” (Whitman, 55). This section of text seems to be quite sensual insofar as he states that simply touching is so electrically charged (sexually stimulating) that all he can bear is just that. 

                The final implication of the telegraph was the spirituality that Whitman was able to produce from it. The final two statements in Whitman’s poem, “I Sing the Body Electric” read, “O I say these are not the parts of the poems of the body only, but of the soul, / O I say now these are the soul,” (Whitman, 258) which emphasizes the ideals that Whitman has regarding electricity “as both spiritual and physical” (Gilmore, 148). It seems that Whitman wants to describe his own poetry as telegraphic or electric. However, “the kind of connection Whitman strives to achieve and his sense that such complete knowledge, such thorough communication, is impossible” (Gilmore, 153). The transcendence of message from sender to receiver in a telegraph is by far much easier than poet/writer to reader, due to lack of or skewed interpretation, diction, tone, mood, et cetera. Still, he clearly wants to suggest that similar to the electricity in the body is equivalent to sexual desire, so too is electricity indicative of spirituality.

               Whitman’s use of the telegraph in his writing was not necessarily that of his own physical use of such an item. Rather, he wrote about the capabilities that the telegraph had to explore his interpretations of larger worldly issues, like race, sexuality, and spirituality. It is intriguing to think that this one man managed to accentuate the concept of worldly connection to broader issues that affect all people of the world; that one immaterial object, although used for communication, became another hindrance to the equality of races, that he already believed in, and also represented other human ideas.

Some more pictures of telegraphic items:

 

Listen to the Alphabet in Morse Code on YouTube:

Alphabet in Morse Code

 This sign is called “Early Telegraph”. It stands today in Elizabethtown, PA (near Lancaster) and it reads: “First commercial telegraph line in the U.S. ran along this railroad right-of-way. Completed from Lancaster to Harrisburg, 1845. The first message, ‘Why don’t you write, you rascals?’, was received, Jan. 8, 1846.” 

 

 

Works Cited:

  1. Collier, Michael. “On Whitman’s ‘To a Locomotive in Winter’.” Virginia Quarterly Review. Page 205.
  2. Gilmore, Paul. “Mad Filaments: Walt Whitman’s Aesthetic Body Telegraphic.” Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism. Stanford University Press. Standford, California. 2009. Pages 148, 153.
  3. Gilmore, Paul. “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics.” American Literature, Volume 76, Number 3. Duke University Press. 2004. Page 479.
  4. Gilmore, Paul. “The Telegraph in Black and White.” ELH 69. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2002. Pages 806, 815, 823-24.
  5. Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass; “I Sing the Body Electric.” Poetry and Prose. Ed. Justin Kaplan. The Library of America. Penguin Books. New York, NY. 1996. Pages 55, 258.
Skip to toolbar