Global Posts Rotating Header Image

October 6th, 2009:

Emily for Oct. 6

Whitman’s “Drum-Taps” is a complete portrayal of war—the triumphant and the non-triumphant, the lovely and the ugly.  Every aspect of war is represented—and with equal energy and zeal.  While I say Whitman wrote with equal energy, I do not mean that he celebrated every moment:  He wrote “triumphant songs” and “cold dirges of the baffled/ And sullen hymns of defeat” (“Year that Trembled” 4-6).  By this I mean that he gave everything equal attention and drove his images home, making his audience feel the full range of emotions that come in a war.

One effect of covering one topic so completely is the blending of loveliness and ugliness—sometimes within the same line.  For example, in “As Toilsome I Wander’d Virginia’s Woods,” Whitman repeats the line “Bold, cautious, true, and my loving comrade” (7).  This line is italicized, and it is the makeshift tombstone for a dead soldier:  a “tablet scrawl’d and nail’d on the tree by the grave” (6).  This image is both lovely and ugly.  The words used to describe the fallen soldier are indicative of a comradery between the men of the unit, but the fact that those words were written quickly on a piece of paper and nailed to a tree illustrate how quickly events transpire in a war—and how even the mourning process must be sped up.

Whitman addresses the constant motion of the world in these poems.  These reminders of the on-going motion of life serve to link those fighting in the war with those waiting at home.  Life goes on for the wound-dresser nursing the dying, the mother back on the farm who just lost her only son, and the men on the frontlines.  Whitman illustrates this in “The Wound-Dresser:” “While the world of gain and appearance and mirth goes on,/So soon what is over forgotten, and waves wash the imprints off the sand” (21-22).  In other words, life will go on for those alive, seeking to move forward and triumph, but the dead will be forgotten, their mark on the world washed away and replaced by the marks of the living.  This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, just a fact of life.  The ones who live have a responsibility to go on, as the nurse in “The Wound Dresser” does:  “On, on I go” (39).  There are many wounded and dying men who need attention from the nurse, so he must keep going on.

Because the world keeps moving forward, those lucky enough to survive a battle or war are able to experience a moment of triumph.  Whitman describes these triumphant moments in celebratory images.  In “Cavalry Crossing a Ford,” Whitman creates the image of a flag waving triumphantly through the air:  “Scarlet and blue and snowy white,/The guidon flags flutter gayly in the wind” (6-7).  This is a moment of celebration and a lovely image.

Sometimes Whitman provides lines that explain his intentions as poet.  Some lines apply to more than just the poems in which they are featured, but in the entire section of poems.  In “City of Ships,” he provides a few such lines:  “I chant and celebrate all that is yours—yet peace no more,/In peace I chanted peace, but now the drum of war is mine,/War, red war is my song through your streets, O city!” (15-17).  These lines indicate that Whitman will write of the entire human experience—including war and death—with equal energy.  He might not find every detail pretty, or worthy of celebration, but he will sing the songs of existence.

Emily for Oct. 6

Whitman’s “Drum-Taps” is a complete portrayal of war—the triumphant and the non-triumphant, the lovely and the ugly.  Every aspect of war is represented—and with equal energy and zeal.  While I say Whitman wrote with equal energy, I do not mean that he celebrated every moment:  He wrote “triumphant songs” and “cold dirges of the baffled/ And sullen hymns of defeat” (“Year that Trembled” 4-6).  By this I mean that he gave everything equal attention and drove his images home, making his audience feel the full range of emotions that come in a war.

One effect of covering one topic so completely is the blending of loveliness and ugliness—sometimes within the same line.  For example, in “As Toilsome I Wander’d Virginia’s Woods,” Whitman repeats the line “Bold, cautious, true, and my loving comrade” (7).  This line is italicized, and it is the makeshift tombstone for a dead soldier:  a “tablet scrawl’d and nail’d on the tree by the grave” (6).  This image is both lovely and ugly.  The words used to describe the fallen soldier are indicative of a comradery between the men of the unit, but the fact that those words were written quickly on a piece of paper and nailed to a tree illustrate how quickly events transpire in a war—and how even the mourning process must be sped up.

Whitman addresses the constant motion of the world in these poems.  These reminders of the on-going motion of life serve to link those fighting in the war with those waiting at home.  Life goes on for the wound-dresser nursing the dying, the mother back on the farm who just lost her only son, and the men on the frontlines.  Whitman illustrates this in “The Wound-Dresser:” “While the world of gain and appearance and mirth goes on,/So soon what is over forgotten, and waves wash the imprints off the sand” (21-22).  In other words, life will go on for those alive, seeking to move forward and triumph, but the dead will be forgotten, their mark on the world washed away and replaced by the marks of the living.  This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, just a fact of life.  The ones who live have a responsibility to go on, as the nurse in “The Wound Dresser” does:  “On, on I go” (39).  There are many wounded and dying men who need attention from the nurse, so he must keep going on.

Because the world keeps moving forward, those lucky enough to survive a battle or war are able to experience a moment of triumph.  Whitman describes these triumphant moments in celebratory images.  In “Cavalry Crossing a Ford,” Whitman creates the image of a flag waving triumphantly through the air:  “Scarlet and blue and snowy white,/The guidon flags flutter gayly in the wind” (6-7).  This is a moment of celebration and a lovely image.

Sometimes Whitman provides lines that explain his intentions as poet.  Some lines apply to more than just the poems in which they are featured, but in the entire section of poems.  In “City of Ships,” he provides a few such lines:  “I chant and celebrate all that is yours—yet peace no more,/In peace I chanted peace, but now the drum of war is mine,/War, red war is my song through your streets, O city!” (15-17).  These lines indicate that Whitman will write of the entire human experience—including war and death—with equal energy.  He might not find every detail pretty, or worthy of celebration, but he will sing the songs of existence.

Emily for Oct. 6

Whitman’s “Drum-Taps” is a complete portrayal of war—the triumphant and the non-triumphant, the lovely and the ugly.  Every aspect of war is represented—and with equal energy and zeal.  While I say Whitman wrote with equal energy, I do not mean that he celebrated every moment:  He wrote “triumphant songs” and “cold dirges of the baffled/ And sullen hymns of defeat” (“Year that Trembled” 4-6).  By this I mean that he gave everything equal attention and drove his images home, making his audience feel the full range of emotions that come in a war.

One effect of covering one topic so completely is the blending of loveliness and ugliness—sometimes within the same line.  For example, in “As Toilsome I Wander’d Virginia’s Woods,” Whitman repeats the line “Bold, cautious, true, and my loving comrade” (7).  This line is italicized, and it is the makeshift tombstone for a dead soldier:  a “tablet scrawl’d and nail’d on the tree by the grave” (6).  This image is both lovely and ugly.  The words used to describe the fallen soldier are indicative of a comradery between the men of the unit, but the fact that those words were written quickly on a piece of paper and nailed to a tree illustrate how quickly events transpire in a war—and how even the mourning process must be sped up.

Whitman addresses the constant motion of the world in these poems.  These reminders of the on-going motion of life serve to link those fighting in the war with those waiting at home.  Life goes on for the wound-dresser nursing the dying, the mother back on the farm who just lost her only son, and the men on the frontlines.  Whitman illustrates this in “The Wound-Dresser:” “While the world of gain and appearance and mirth goes on,/So soon what is over forgotten, and waves wash the imprints off the sand” (21-22).  In other words, life will go on for those alive, seeking to move forward and triumph, but the dead will be forgotten, their mark on the world washed away and replaced by the marks of the living.  This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, just a fact of life.  The ones who live have a responsibility to go on, as the nurse in “The Wound Dresser” does:  “On, on I go” (39).  There are many wounded and dying men who need attention from the nurse, so he must keep going on.

Because the world keeps moving forward, those lucky enough to survive a battle or war are able to experience a moment of triumph.  Whitman describes these triumphant moments in celebratory images.  In “Cavalry Crossing a Ford,” Whitman creates the image of a flag waving triumphantly through the air:  “Scarlet and blue and snowy white,/The guidon flags flutter gayly in the wind” (6-7).  This is a moment of celebration and a lovely image.

Sometimes Whitman provides lines that explain his intentions as poet.  Some lines apply to more than just the poems in which they are featured, but in the entire section of poems.  In “City of Ships,” he provides a few such lines:  “I chant and celebrate all that is yours—yet peace no more,/In peace I chanted peace, but now the drum of war is mine,/War, red war is my song through your streets, O city!” (15-17).  These lines indicate that Whitman will write of the entire human experience—including war and death—with equal energy.  He might not find every detail pretty, or worthy of celebration, but he will sing the songs of existence.

Elizabeth for October 8th: Lincoln’s Funeral Train

Each time I read Whitman’s verse on Lincoln it never fails to inspire me.

Lincoln's funeral train

Lincoln was the first president whose funeral was taken to the public on a grand scale–his coffin was set on a thirteen day journey by train.  The train and its attendees traveled from Washington to Springfield, Illinois, through seven states and several major cities.  Hundreds of thousands of people attended the viewing of the president in Philadelphia alone.

According to accounts “Long lines of the general public began forming by 5:00 A.M. At its greatest, the double line was three miles long and wound from the Delaware to the Schuylkill. Philadelphia officials estimated 300,000 people passed by Mr. Lincoln’s open coffin. The wait was up to five hours. So many people wanted to view Mr. Lincoln’s body that police had difficulty maintaining order in the lines; some people had their clothing ripped, others fainted, one broke her arm.”

Lincoln’s death was universally mourned, and Whitman’s elegy for the president is emotionally stirring, evoking both the poet as a lone mourner as well as the throngs that flocked to behold the president in death.  Whitman describes the journey of the coffin through the rural landscapes of America as it travels from east to west.  But the poem does not linger on the journey itself, but also grasps a greater effect by detailing Lincoln’s “burial house”–the symbols that represent the great man:

Pictures of growing spring and farms and homes,

With the Fourth-month eve at sundown, and the gray smoke lucid and bright,

With floods of the yellow gold and gorgeous, indolent, sinking sun, burning, expanding the air,

With the fresh sweet herbage under foot, and the pale green leaves of the trees prolific…

And the city at hand with dwellings so dense, ands tacks of chimneys,

And all the scenes of life and the workshops, and the workmen homeward returning (462.)

Lincoln in an open coffin

Whitman immortalizes Lincoln as the morning star, the star that sets in the west with his death.  The narrator is then held between the thrush’s poetic exuberance on death and the mournful pull of memory of Lincoln in life.  Death is celebrated as a companion, a universal force worthy of praise, an escape from the suffering of living.  Yet the narrator moves between these two forces throughout the entire poem, only to escape the cycle and move beyond the lilac and the star at its very conclusion.  The poem ends with praise for “the sweetest, wisest soul of all my days and lands” and the release of Lincoln into the embrace of death and his immortalization through the ode.

Christine for 10/8

I wanted to mention that “Race of Veterans” (Page 452) has so much “stuff” that could be discussed, I think I would have done better with this post if it was actually a 3-5 page paper…anyway…

So, where do I begin? How about the idea of race being thought of in two different ways: one being the distinguishing factor of origin of people based on skin color and/or geography or even of some kind of similarity (i.e. background, tradition, culture, etc) and the other as a journy to a destination of some sort, in competition with other people.

 ”Race of veterans – race of victors” : In this phrase, I imagine that veterans are of their own race, or more specifically, of their own kind; that unless you personally have served in battle, killed another human being, watched a comrade die in front of your very eyes, or anything else that is experienced by a veteran, you have become a member of a group of people that average civilians know nothing about. By combining the two phrases together, it strikes me as a journey, where those who are battling against the opposing side have time either for or against them, resulting in a “victor.” As a side note, I took “victor” to mean not only the side that won the battle or the war, but as a veteran, are the individuals then victors themselves for defeating all the cold, hunger, and death that the others did not?

“Race of the soil, ready for conflict 0 race of the conquering march!” : I felt that this line was directly related to the poem entirely in that the race of veterans (the journey of veterans to defeat the opposing side) begins with the marching of their feet across the soil into the direction, and therefore direct conflict with those whom they are fighting. The “conquering” march is the one that the veterans believe will lead them to their victory.

“(No more credulity’s race, abiding temper’d race)” : To be honest, I’m not sure what to make of this line exactly. I’m thinking that it has something to do with the idea that this race against time to win the war may not be founded in much evidence, the veterans-to-be believe that they can still conquer the opposing side. Possibly “abiding temper’d race” is leaning towards the idea that they are going to tolerate the other side’s desire to fight?! I’m really not sure…

“Race henceforth owning no law but the law of itself”" : Here, I feel that if talking about the race as a conquest, it means that there are no set rules or regulations to follow, except to just win. However, on the other side of what race could mean, insinuates that certain races (inferior/superior) have different sets of laws of which to abide, according to the other end of the spectrum but that each race individually does not own any one specific law; moreso that there are general laws that all humans must follow.

“Race of passion and the storm” : Through all kinds of weather (literal and figurative), each side of the war, each race, each group of people, must somehow reach some end.

Maybe none of this really makes sense, and maybe I did not combine all of the ideas too well. However, I though it was a remarkable little poem that each of us could reflect on and find some connection with, even if the connection is as simple as finding the struggle to overcome something like a fear, obstacle, whatever, just as the veterans of a war must overcome the other side, and death.

Christine for 10/8

I wanted to mention that “Race of Veterans” (Page 452) has so much “stuff” that could be discussed, I think I would have done better with this post if it was actually a 3-5 page paper…anyway…

So, where do I begin? How about the idea of race being thought of in two different ways: one being the distinguishing factor of origin of people based on skin color and/or geography or even of some kind of similarity (i.e. background, tradition, culture, etc) and the other as a journy to a destination of some sort, in competition with other people.

 ”Race of veterans – race of victors” : In this phrase, I imagine that veterans are of their own race, or more specifically, of their own kind; that unless you personally have served in battle, killed another human being, watched a comrade die in front of your very eyes, or anything else that is experienced by a veteran, you have become a member of a group of people that average civilians know nothing about. By combining the two phrases together, it strikes me as a journey, where those who are battling against the opposing side have time either for or against them, resulting in a “victor.” As a side note, I took “victor” to mean not only the side that won the battle or the war, but as a veteran, are the individuals then victors themselves for defeating all the cold, hunger, and death that the others did not?

“Race of the soil, ready for conflict 0 race of the conquering march!” : I felt that this line was directly related to the poem entirely in that the race of veterans (the journey of veterans to defeat the opposing side) begins with the marching of their feet across the soil into the direction, and therefore direct conflict with those whom they are fighting. The “conquering” march is the one that the veterans believe will lead them to their victory.

“(No more credulity’s race, abiding temper’d race)” : To be honest, I’m not sure what to make of this line exactly. I’m thinking that it has something to do with the idea that this race against time to win the war may not be founded in much evidence, the veterans-to-be believe that they can still conquer the opposing side. Possibly “abiding temper’d race” is leaning towards the idea that they are going to tolerate the other side’s desire to fight?! I’m really not sure…

“Race henceforth owning no law but the law of itself”" : Here, I feel that if talking about the race as a conquest, it means that there are no set rules or regulations to follow, except to just win. However, on the other side of what race could mean, insinuates that certain races (inferior/superior) have different sets of laws of which to abide, according to the other end of the spectrum but that each race individually does not own any one specific law; moreso that there are general laws that all humans must follow.

“Race of passion and the storm” : Through all kinds of weather (literal and figurative), each side of the war, each race, each group of people, must somehow reach some end.

Maybe none of this really makes sense, and maybe I did not combine all of the ideas too well. However, I though it was a remarkable little poem that each of us could reflect on and find some connection with, even if the connection is as simple as finding the struggle to overcome something like a fear, obstacle, whatever, just as the veterans of a war must overcome the other side, and death.

Christine for 10/8

I wanted to mention that “Race of Veterans” (Page 452) has so much “stuff” that could be discussed, I think I would have done better with this post if it was actually a 3-5 page paper…anyway…

So, where do I begin? How about the idea of race being thought of in two different ways: one being the distinguishing factor of origin of people based on skin color and/or geography or even of some kind of similarity (i.e. background, tradition, culture, etc) and the other as a journy to a destination of some sort, in competition with other people.

 “Race of veterans – race of victors” : In this phrase, I imagine that veterans are of their own race, or more specifically, of their own kind; that unless you personally have served in battle, killed another human being, watched a comrade die in front of your very eyes, or anything else that is experienced by a veteran, you have become a member of a group of people that average civilians know nothing about. By combining the two phrases together, it strikes me as a journey, where those who are battling against the opposing side have time either for or against them, resulting in a “victor.” As a side note, I took “victor” to mean not only the side that won the battle or the war, but as a veteran, are the individuals then victors themselves for defeating all the cold, hunger, and death that the others did not?

“Race of the soil, ready for conflict 0 race of the conquering march!” : I felt that this line was directly related to the poem entirely in that the race of veterans (the journey of veterans to defeat the opposing side) begins with the marching of their feet across the soil into the direction, and therefore direct conflict with those whom they are fighting. The “conquering” march is the one that the veterans believe will lead them to their victory.

“(No more credulity’s race, abiding temper’d race)” : To be honest, I’m not sure what to make of this line exactly. I’m thinking that it has something to do with the idea that this race against time to win the war may not be founded in much evidence, the veterans-to-be believe that they can still conquer the opposing side. Possibly “abiding temper’d race” is leaning towards the idea that they are going to tolerate the other side’s desire to fight?! I’m really not sure…

“Race henceforth owning no law but the law of itself”” : Here, I feel that if talking about the race as a conquest, it means that there are no set rules or regulations to follow, except to just win. However, on the other side of what race could mean, insinuates that certain races (inferior/superior) have different sets of laws of which to abide, according to the other end of the spectrum but that each race individually does not own any one specific law; moreso that there are general laws that all humans must follow.

“Race of passion and the storm” : Through all kinds of weather (literal and figurative), each side of the war, each race, each group of people, must somehow reach some end.

Maybe none of this really makes sense, and maybe I did not combine all of the ideas too well. However, I though it was a remarkable little poem that each of us could reflect on and find some connection with, even if the connection is as simple as finding the struggle to overcome something like a fear, obstacle, whatever, just as the veterans of a war must overcome the other side, and death.

Elizabeth for October 8th: Lincoln’s Funeral Train

Each time I read Whitman’s verse on Lincoln it never fails to inspire me.

Lincoln's funeral train

Lincoln was the first president whose funeral was taken to the public on a grand scale–his coffin was set on a thirteen day journey by train.  The train and its attendees traveled from Washington to Springfield, Illinois, through seven states and several major cities.  Hundreds of thousands of people attended the viewing of the president in Philadelphia alone.

According to accounts “Long lines of the general public began forming by 5:00 A.M. At its greatest, the double line was three miles long and wound from the Delaware to the Schuylkill. Philadelphia officials estimated 300,000 people passed by Mr. Lincoln’s open coffin. The wait was up to five hours. So many people wanted to view Mr. Lincoln’s body that police had difficulty maintaining order in the lines; some people had their clothing ripped, others fainted, one broke her arm.”

Lincoln’s death was universally mourned, and Whitman’s elegy for the president is emotionally stirring, evoking both the poet as a lone mourner as well as the throngs that flocked to behold the president in death.  Whitman describes the journey of the coffin through the rural landscapes of America as it travels from east to west.  But the poem does not linger on the journey itself, but also grasps a greater effect by detailing Lincoln’s “burial house”–the symbols that represent the great man:

Pictures of growing spring and farms and homes,

With the Fourth-month eve at sundown, and the gray smoke lucid and bright,

With floods of the yellow gold and gorgeous, indolent, sinking sun, burning, expanding the air,

With the fresh sweet herbage under foot, and the pale green leaves of the trees prolific…

And the city at hand with dwellings so dense, ands tacks of chimneys,

And all the scenes of life and the workshops, and the workmen homeward returning (462.)

Lincoln in an open coffin

Whitman immortalizes Lincoln as the morning star, the star that sets in the west with his death.  The narrator is then held between the thrush’s poetic exuberance on death and the mournful pull of memory of Lincoln in life.  Death is celebrated as a companion, a universal force worthy of praise, an escape from the suffering of living.  Yet the narrator moves between these two forces throughout the entire poem, only to escape the cycle and move beyond the lilac and the star at its very conclusion.  The poem ends with praise for “the sweetest, wisest soul of all my days and lands” and the release of Lincoln into the embrace of death and his immortalization through the ode.

Women in Whitman

From Walt Whitman: An Encyclopedia, Sherry Ceniza questions Whitman’s representation of women in his poetry.  Overall she presents a favorable opinion of his treatment of women.  Aside from his focus on women as domestic rather than working outside the home and their portrayal as “dutiful wives” in “A Woman Waits for Me” and “I Sing the Body Electric” (Kummings & LeMaster 798), Whitman speaks to women as strong mothers, strong beings and invites them into public life.

It is his analogy of birthing to creating Leaves of Grass and the “Mother to All” on which I choose to focus.  Ceniza explains, “Birthing always held top value for Whitman, who, in many ways, saw literal birthing and the creation of Leaves as analogous” (Kummings & LeMaster 798).  This  use of a women’s physical experience in describing his own beautiful creation allows one to see the great importance Whitman places on women and the birthing experience.  Donald E. Hall in “Literary and Cultural Theory” describes the work of Elizabeth Grosz in “Volatile Bodies” to explain the work of post-structuralist feminists.  He writes, “She suggests that by examining women’s corporeal experiences-including childbirth and menstruation-male-centered norms can be challenged without resorting to an essentialism that erases the ways in which our bodies are given meaning through social customs and our language system”(209-210).

Therefore in using women’s bodily experience in comparison to his own work and detailing their strength, Whitman breaks free from the “phallocentric” norm and gives great import to female imagery.

Though not fully feminist, his work appears to contribute more toward gender equality than it would take away.

Women in Whitman

From Walt Whitman: An Encyclopedia, Sherry Ceniza questions Whitman’s representation of women in his poetry.  Overall she presents a favorable opinion of his treatment of women.  Aside from his focus on women as domestic rather than working outside the home and their portrayal as “dutiful wives” in “A Woman Waits for Me” and “I Sing the Body Electric” (Kummings & LeMaster 798), Whitman speaks to women as strong mothers, strong beings and invites them into public life.

It is his analogy of birthing to creating Leaves of Grass and the “Mother to All” on which I choose to focus.  Ceniza explains, “Birthing always held top value for Whitman, who, in many ways, saw literal birthing and the creation of Leaves as analogous” (Kummings & LeMaster 798).  This  use of a women’s physical experience in describing his own beautiful creation allows one to see the great importance Whitman places on women and the birthing experience.  Donald E. Hall in “Literary and Cultural Theory” describes the work of Elizabeth Grosz in “Volatile Bodies” to explain the work of post-structuralist feminists.  He writes, “She suggests that by examining women’s corporeal experiences-including childbirth and menstruation-male-centered norms can be challenged without resorting to an essentialism that erases the ways in which our bodies are given meaning through social customs and our language system”(209-210).

Therefore in using women’s bodily experience in comparison to his own work and detailing their strength, Whitman breaks free from the “phallocentric” norm and gives great import to female imagery.

Though not fully feminist, his work appears to contribute more toward gender equality than it would take away.

Skip to toolbar